How Much Crying Is Normal for a Baby? What the Research Shows
By Lybadora Editorial Team4 min read
A 2017 meta-analysis of 8,690 infants across 28 studies found that average daily fussing and crying stays fairly stable at about 117 to 133 minutes a day through the first six weeks, then drops to about 68 minutes a day by 10 to 12 weeks. Using a standard clinical definition of colic, the same review found colic in 17% to 25% of infants in the first six weeks, falling to 11% by 8 to 9 weeks and to just 0.6% by 10 to 12 weeks.
Explanation
"Is this normal?" is one of the hardest questions to answer about a crying baby, precisely because crying is the one thing every baby does that has no other channel, it is the whole communication system for the first months of life. A 2017 meta-analysis is the largest attempt to actually measure what "normal" looks like, week by week.
Supporting evidence
Wolke, Bilgin and Samara pooled data from 28 diary studies (33 samples, 8,690 infants total) that had parents record fussing and crying in real time across the first three months.
| Age | Average daily fuss/cry time |
|---|---|
| 1–2 weeks | 117–133 minutes |
| 3–4 weeks | 117–133 minutes |
| 5–6 weeks | 117–133 minutes |
| 8–9 weeks | falling |
| 10–12 weeks | 68 minutes |
Colic prevalence, using a modified version of the standard clinical definition (crying more than 3 hours a day, more than 3 days a week):
| Age | Colic prevalence |
|---|---|
| First 6 weeks | 17%–25% |
| 8–9 weeks | 11% |
| 10–12 weeks | 0.6% |
Wolke, Bilgin & Samara, The Journal of Pediatrics, 2017
What the numbers mean
Two things in this data run against common assumptions. First, the total is essentially flat, not rising, across the first six weeks: crying does not have a dramatic peak week that then falls away, it holds at a stable, high level and then drops in the two months after. Second, the drop by 10 to 12 weeks is large: nearly double the total minutes falls to close to half, and colic prevalence falls by more than 95% relative to its peak.
That means the single most useful piece of context for a parent of a 5-week-old is not a comparison with other 5-week-olds, the range at that age is wide and the average itself is high, but the fact that this level is close to the peak of a curve that reliably comes down, not a new steady state.
What parents can observe
- Total daily crying and fussing time, logged rather than estimated, this is exactly the kind of total that is easy to over- or under-remember by the end of a long day.
- The trend across weeks, since the meaningful signal in this data is the trajectory (falling by 10–12 weeks) rather than any single day's total.
- What is different from usual, which is a more useful question at any age than "is this normal", a change in pitch, duration, or consolability from a baby's own pattern is more informative than a population average.
What may explain a pattern
The research above describes the typical curve, not its causes for a given baby, the same review notes wide variability between infants and between measurement methods. A crying total that is high but stable, and that responds to a baby's usual soothing methods, is consistent with this range. A change from a baby's own established pattern is the more useful thing to flag than the absolute total.
What parents can do
Track daily crying and fussing time if it is a source of worry, a log across a week is far more useful than any single hard day, both for your own sense of the trend and for a conversation with a clinician. Expect the total to be high and fairly flat through around six weeks, and expect it to fall substantially by 10 to 12 weeks; if it is not following that trajectory, or a baby is inconsolable in a way that is new, that is worth raising directly rather than waiting it out.
Safety considerations
Crying that is unusual for your baby, a different sound, unusually high-pitched, or accompanied by fever, vomiting, unusual limpness, or difficulty being consoled by any of your usual methods, should be treated as a reason to contact a clinician rather than compared against averages. This article describes population research on typical crying patterns and is not a tool for assessing an individual baby.